![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
02439 COMPARISON OF DRUG ABSORPTION FOLLOWING INTRAVAGINAL ADMINISTRATION TO RATS AND RABBITS Litterst, Charles* Objective of the study was to compare rabbit and rat as models for evaluation of vaginal uptake and tissue distribution of drugs following intravaginal administration. Radioactive lamivudine (well absorbed orally) and ganciclovir (poorly absorbed orally) were formulated in Replense, administered in 0.5 ml, and animals placed in metabolism cages (n=3/group). Fluids/feces were collected for 48 hrs and tissue content of radioactivity was compared at 4 hrs. Rat tissues were also analyzed at 12 and 48 hrs. Less than 1% of the administered dose of either drug was found in the blood of either species at any time point, although high concentrations found in urine suggests that there was significant systemic uptake. Rats excreted 32% of lamivudine dose in 4 hr, and rabbits excreted 5%. By 48 hr, total amount of radioactivity in urine of rats and rabbits was 45% and 37%, respectively. Percent of dose in feces at 48 hr was 37% for rats and 13% for rabbits. After administration of ganciclovir to rats, 15% of the dose was found in urine and 51% in feces at 48 hr. In rabbits, 9% and 8% were recovered in 48 hr urine and feces, respectively. Less than 5% of total radioactivity from either drug remained in tissues at the end of the study. Rat tissues with the largest fraction of dose were vagina, GI tract, and large organs (muscle and skin). A similar quantity of radioactivity was recovered in most tissues for both drugs. A notable exception was rat vagina, which at 4 hr contained 8-10% of the dose for both drugs, in contrast to rabbit vagina, which contained only 0.1% of the administered dose. No drug was found in rat bladder, although from 13%-19% of total radioactivity was found in rabbit bladder. These high levels may be due to urethral transit of drug from the vagina into the bladder of rabbits. In summary, significant systemic absorption of both drugs occurs following intravaginal administration. Thus, possible systemic effects may be a concern following intravaginal administration of drugs. Dr. Charles Litterst, Div. of AIDS, NIAID, NIH |
|||||||||||||