![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
02284 MICROBICIDE FEASIBILITY STUDY, MWANZA, TANZANIA: PRIORITISING & RESPONDING TO COMMUNITY CONCERNS Shagi Charles* OBJECTIVES: To explore strategies for effective community liaison & participation in the context of a feasibility study for a phase III clinical trial of vaginal microbicides in a high-risk occupational study population in Mwanza City, Northern Tanzania. STUDY POPULATION: 2,400 women working as mamalishe (in makeshift eating places selling food cooked outdoors), or in bars, guesthouses, video halls, vilabu (shops selling locally brewed beer), hotels, restaurants and disco halls (facilities) in Mwanza City. METHODS: A community-based sexual & reproductive health service has been established in 10 city wards. Field staff conduct mobilisation activities at facility level. Participants are enrolled and followed-up at mobile clinics conducted at guesthouses and hotels. Wards were divided into geographical clusters of facilities with 20-30 women per cluster. Cluster and ward-level representatives were elected in a process facilitated by the projects Community Liaison Officer. Criteria for the selection of representatives were developed by the community e.g. ability to maintain confidentiality, willingness to attend meetings and to represent others. Orientation workshops and community meetings have explored project-related concerns using tools adapted from participatory learning and action (PLA) and related techniques e.g. Venn diagrams, matrices, pair-wise ranking. Development of a city-level Community Liaison Board comprising ward representatives is on-going. RESULTS: 32 facility clusters each with one elected representative have been identified in four study wards up to end-Sep 03. Mamalishe and vilabu found in pre-existing geographical clusters (e.g. market places) share concerns and experiences that differ from women working in other facilities. Key clinic-related concerns included waiting times, incentives and speculum examination. CONCLUSIONS: The Mwanza feasibility study was designed around a high-risk occupational cohort in which traditional community development concepts such as general community mobilisation, representation, liaison and participation are difficult to apply. Representation was tackled by using clusters of facilities as core units in a community defined by eligibility to join a study cohort. Adopting community development approaches that made use of participatory methodologies was key to developing meaningful dialogue. Shagi Charles |
|||||||||||||