![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
02674 REACHING CONSENSUS: DEVELOPING AN AGREED CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL FOR A MULTI-CENTRE MICROBICIDE RCT Mc Cormack, Sheena* Background: Since the MDP started in October 2001, Feasibility Studies have been initiated in six sites: Durban, Johannesburg and Mtubatuba (South Africa), Masaka (Uganda), Mazabuka (Zambia) and Mwanza (Tanzania) in preparation for a RCT of two microbicides. In parallel, working groups (Clinical Trial, Laboratory, Social Science and Community) were established to review and address issues relevant to the development of the protocol and implementation of the trial. Objectives: The objectives of the Feasibility Studies include: to collect data on HIV incidence and prevalence, sexual behaviour including anal sex and condom use and determine ability to recruit and retain women in follow-up. The objectives of the Clinical Trial Working Group are to address issues relevant to the trial design. Methods: Six cohorts have been established and details are presented elsewhere. A timetable of topics to be addressed by the Clinical Trials Working Group was drawn up. The group included at least one member from each site, and a central group including the facilitators of the other working groups. An overview of each topic was circulated to all members by email with clear timelines for response, which were summarised prior to review by conference call in order to reach consensus. Results: Although there is international debate about the control group(s) for microbicide RCTs, investigators were unanimously in favour of a single control group (placebo gel) due to concerns with regard to differential behaviour between women allocated to gel or no gel and consequent difficulty in interpreting the trial result. The advantages and disadvantages of various lengths of follow-up (6, 9, 12 and 24 months) were considered and will be presented. HIV testing, support and care are not readily available in the participating communities, and as a result HIV-positive women are not excluded from the research in all sites. Nonetheless, it was agreed that only HIV negative women would be eligible for the trial. Limiting the upper age limit in order to select women at highest risk was also discussed, but in the interests of generalisability of the trial result it was decided not to have an upper age restriction. For similar reasons, and because of the difficulty in collecting robust data on the subject, it was decided not to exclude women who reported practising anal sex or use of vaginal products to enhance sex at screening. Conclusion: Effective communication between the members of this large group was achieved using the strategy described. All the sites and investigators have contributed actively towards the development of the randomised placebo-controlled trial protocol to be implemented in 2004. Dr. Sheena McCormack |
|||||||||||||